By Resolution No. 12-2024, the National Court of Justice established the following binding jurisprudential precedent:
“The act will not be effective nor the linkage in the administrative enforcement procedure legally viable, with respect to those responsible by representation (joint debtor), when the notification to them of the administrative acts of determination whose collection is pursued had been omitted, since due process is violated, in the guarantee of the right to defense”.
Article 27 of the Tax Code establishes that the following people are responsible by representation and liable up to the value of the assets administered by them and that of the income produced during their management:
The resolution, which has the force of law, states that the collection of a responsible by representation cannot be pursued in a coercive collection process, when such collection is based on an obligation which determination process was pursued exclusively against the taxpayer without having notified the responsible by representation. In other words, if the person responsible by representation was not notified in the administrative enforcement process that determined the obligation, they cannot be held jointly and severally liable for the payment thereof.
© TobarZVS
This publication contains information of general interest and does not constitute legal opinion on specific issues. Any analysis will require legal advice from the Firm.